Distractions, reflections

David Ing, at large … Sometimes, my mind wanders

2007/07/27 Ryoan-ji rock garden

On our third — and last — day in the Kyoto area, Diana and I went to see the rock garden at Ryoan-ji, the famous Zen Buddhist temple.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_rock_garden_three_islands.jpg

The placement is such that, from any angle, all of the rocks can not be simultaneously seen. At least one rock will always be hidden behind another.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_rock_garden_view_west.jpg

The image is famous, but the reality is that visitors are not allowed off the veranda, so that the gravel is not disturbed. Unfortunately, with the rock garden enclosed on three sides by walls, only the south overlook is available.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_veranda.jpg

Inside, there’s not much to see. At the entry, there’s a set of screens.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_screens.jpg

The west porch has a connecting bridge to a private area.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_west_porch.jpg

On the north side of the building, there’s a small water basin.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_basin.jpg

South of the rock garden is a large pond.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_map.jpg

Looking westward over the pond, we saw a bridge.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_pond_bridge.jpg

Walking around and over the bridge, there’s the torii symbolizing Shinto.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_torii_bridge.jpg

We were amused by the stones dressed with aprons under the protection of a shed. In Shinto, everything is sacred, including stones.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_stones_shed.jpg

Even within a Zen Buddhist temple, there’s a Shinto shrine.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_torii.jpg

The grounds are well groomed, and the shade from overhanging trees was a relief on another hot and humid day.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_front_exit_walk.jpg

Diana liked the support struts provided for many trees.

20070726_Ryoan-ji_tree_support.jpg

Ryoan-ji is up in the northwest hills of Kyoto. The bus stops in front of Ritsumeikan University, with a ten-minute walk west to the temple. There are other famous temples nearby, that we didn’t get to see with only three days in Kyoto.

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • RSS on Coevolving

    • Root Metaphors and World Hypotheses | ST-ON 2023-01-09
      Researching the philosophical foundations of systems theory to understand the meanings of “causal texture, contextualism, contextural” from the Tavistock legacy led to philosopher Stephen C. Pepper. The philosophical lineage and contributions of Pepper were the focus for the January online meeting of Systems Thinking Ontario.  A deep reading of Pepper’s work (over a month!) was […]
    • World Hypotheses, Contextualism, Systems Methods
      The first Systems Thinking Ontario session for 2023 is scheduled for January 9, on “Root Metaphors and World Hypotheses”.  This is philosophical content, for which a guided tour and discussion will be better than attempting a solo reading of the World Hypotheses wiki on the Open Learning Commons.  Upon announcing the session on social media, […]
    • Reifying Systems Thinking towards Changes | ST-ON 2022-10-17
      The October online meeting of Systems Thinking Ontario presented an opportunity for an update on progress made by the Systems Changes Learning Circle by 2022.  A slide deck had been prepared an in-person seminar at the Universitat de Barcelona Graduate Programmes in Business, organized by Ryan C. Armstrong, one week earlier.  Our regular monthly meeting, […]
    • Knowing Better via Systems Thinking | U. Barcelona 2022-10-10
      Just before starting a trip to Spain, I received an invitation from Ryan C. Armstrong at the Universitat de Barcelona Business School to give some lectures.  The students in the bachelor’s programme in international business had a short mention of systems thinking in the first lecture of the operationa management class.  With that brief entry, […]
    • Four system traps, in undesirable regimes
      While the adaptive cycle and panarchical connections reflect the possiblity of movement from one stable state to another, it’s possible to get “stuck” in a disfavoured trap.  Social ecological systems involve both natural systems and human systems. After widespread recognition of the 2002 Panarchy book, reflections in 2010 revealed further development of the theory and […]
    • Types of learning, with panarchical change as (i) incremental, (ii) lurching, and (iii) transformational
      In order to appreciate the influence of resilience science and panarchy on ongoing research into systems changes, revisiting foundational works sometimes resurfaces insights.  In the 2002 Panarchy book, Chapter 15 provides a summary of findings. In the course of the project hat led to this volume, we identified twelve conclusions (Table 15-1) in our search for […]
  • RSS on Media Queue

  • RSS on Ing Brief

  • Meta

  • Translate

  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
    Theme modified from DevDmBootstrap4 by Danny Machal