Distractions, reflections

David Ing, at large … Sometimes, my mind wanders

2007/01/06 JFK airport is Heathrowesque

I guess that I’ve travelled on airplanes for about 35 years, yet I’ve never been routed through JFK airport in New York. From Toronto, I’ve flown to Laguardia airport and Newark airport many times, but I’ve never had an intercontinental flight that would send me to JFK. This time, the huge price differences in airfares to Finland drove me to take this alternative.

The American Airlines puddle-jumper flight from Toronto to JFK was slightly annoying, because they insisted on my checking my carry-on luggage when I boarded. I chose that luggage specifically because it’s well under-sized for carry-on! Strangely enough, the Toronto to JFK flight took off late and then flew only 1 hour, while it usually takes 1:20 for a flight to Laguardia.

My first impression of JFK airport was that it was new and modern. The American Airlines flight landed at Terminal 9, and at the very end of the pier.

JFK Terminal 9 pier

Following the signs led to a long escalator ride down, and then an underpass, to an long elevator ride up.

JFK Terminal 9 underpass

At top of the elevator, I passed the security gates where passengers check in to Terminal 9 flights. This was getting to be a very long walk.

JFK Terminal 9 security

Then, the transfer required leaving Terminal 9 and entering Terminal 8.

JFK Terminal 9 - Terminal 8 bridge

After going through some narrow corridors, the Finnair gates looked ominous. I arrived just in time for the 45-minute cutoff.

JFK Terminal 8 Finnair checkin

Since I was changing terminals, it meant security and x-rays again. I then finally found myself in a very dark and warm gate area. Finnair could use some brightening up!

JFK Terminal 8 Finnair gate

Marianne had scheduled the same flight, which would make the pickup in Finland somewhat simpler. She was passing her time on needlepoint, having arrived at the terminal in light traffic (with a courtesy upgrade to the American Airlines lounge serving free drinks!)

JFK Terminal 8 MK

It strikes me that JFK airport must have been designed in the days before airports had shuttle trains running between terminals. I know why passengers complain about changing terminals at Heathrow, and I now know why there are so many complaints about JFK. Although JFK Terminals 8 and 9 are right next to each other, there’s probably at least a 2-mile walk between the two! I’m glad that airport designers have figured out better ways to design passenger transfers, but I guess that that doesn’t help older terminals.

2007/01/20 addendum: On the return flight through JFK, I had a 75-minute connection. After leaving the plane, I had to wait in a long line for immigration with a few hundred people. Then, I had to claim my luggage (which was 15 minutes to come down) so that I could recheck it for Canada. I ran through Terminal 8, retracing the path from the outbound. When I reached Terminal 9, I starting hearing the final calls for flight to Toronto, but still had to go down the escalators, across the underpass, and up the escalators.

I ran the rest of the way to the end of the long pier at Terminal 9, and arrived 2 minutes before the flight was to leave. The check-in clerks said that I was too late. They rebooked me on the next morning’s American Airlines flight, because the 5:15 p.m. is the last one to Toronto. I then walked all the way back to the Finnair counter in Terminal 8, where I caught the check-in clerks leaving for the day. A few minutes later, a kind Finnair representative generously gave me a vouchers for a hotel and meals. (My luggage would stay locked up in transit overnight). He said that American Express Travel shouldn’t have booked such a tight connection, and that a 2-hour transfer is the minimum for JFK airport.

I’ll do my best to avoid JFK airport from now on. I didn’t really need to spend another night in a hotel, and I think that the extra stress prolonged my jet lag from this trip. Changing planes in the United States, having to claim and recheck baggage, is just a bad idea.

  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • RSS on Coevolving

    • What Systems Thinkers Can Learn From Historical Synthesis | Dr. Michael Bonner | Systems Thinking Ontario 2023-11-13
      For the November 2023 Systems Thinking Ontario session, historian and policy advisor Dr. Michael Bonner was invited for an interview by Zaid Khan.  In organizing the sessions, we’re trying to avoid the trap of systems thinking becoming a discipline, through learning with a sweeping-in process. The session opened on a map of The Sassanid Empire […]
    • The Sweep-In Process of Systems Science (Churchman)
      It the systems sciences are an open system, then learning more and more about systems of interest are foundational.  This was called a sweep-in process by C. West Churchman, in the heritage of Edgar A. Singer. Jr.  A concise definition is found in the entry on “Experimentalism” in the International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics: […]
    • Explaining Systems Changes Learning | RSD12 | 2023-10-14
      For the Relating Systems and Design RSD12 symposium on October 14, 2023, members of the Explainers subgroup of the Systems Changes Learning Circle conducted an in-person workshop on “Explaining Systems Changes Learning: Metaphors and translations” at OCADU in Toronto. RSD12 included both in-person sessions and online sessions. In the planning phase for the symposium, our […]
    • Anticipatory Systems, Evolution, and Extinction Cascades | Judith Rosen | ST-ON 2023-10-16
      Judith Rosen agreed to give an online presentation for the Systems Thinking Ontario meeting in October 2023, after we converted her in-person meeting at OCADU in August into a discussion circle.  Channelling the anticipatory systems approach of her father, mathematical biologist Robert Rosen, Judith has been extended those ideas in her own continuing observation of […]
    • Appreciating systems changes via multiparadigm inquiry (SRBS)
      An article related to the ISSS plenary talk of July 2022 has now passed the peer review process, and is published in early view for Systems Research and Behavioral Science.  It should shortly be printed in the November issue of SRBS that serves as the General Systems Yearbook. Update on Nov. 22, 2023: A full-text, […]
    • Sustainable Technology and the Entropy Argument | Mohammed Badrah, Kelly Okamura, David Hawk | Systems Thinking Ontario 2023-09-11
      In a return to original Systems Thinking Ontario format, we reviewed an (old) systems thinking paper from 1998. Mohammed Badrah served as reviewer. Kelly Okamura was the discussant. The author, David Hawk, was available during the discussion period for extended knowledge. As compared to prior Systems Thinking Ontario sessions with the word “entropy” in the […]
  • RSS on Media Queue

    • 2021/06/17 Keekok Lee | Philosophy of Chinese Medicine 2
      Following the first day lecture on Philosophy of Chinese Medicine 1 for the Global University for Sustainability, Keekok Lee continued on a second day on some topics: * Anatomy as structure; physiology as function (and process); * Process ontology, and thing ontology; * Qi ju as qi-in-concentrating mode, and qi san as qi-in-dissipsating mode; and […]
    • 2021/06/16 Keekok Lee | Philosophy of Chinese Medicine 1
      The philosophy of science underlying Classical Chinese Medicine, in this lecture by Keekok Lee, provides insights into ways in which systems change may be approached, in a process ontology in contrast to the thing ontology underlying Western BioMedicine. Read more ›
    • 2021/02/02 To Understand This Era, You Need to Think in Systems | Zeynep Tufekci with Ezra Klein | New York Times
      In conversation, @zeynep with @ezraklein reveal authentic #SystemsThinking in (i) appreciating that “science” is constructed by human collectives, (ii) the west orients towards individual outcomes rather than population levels; and (iii) there’s an over-emphasis on problems of the moment, and…Read more ›
    • 2019/04/09 Art as a discipline of inquiry | Tim Ingold (web video)
      In the question-answer period after the lecture, #TimIngold proposes art as a discipline of inquiry, rather than ethnography. This refers to his thinking On Human Correspondence. — begin paste — [75m26s question] I am curious to know what art, or…Read more ›
    • 2019/10/16 | “Bubbles, Golden Ages, and Tech Revolutions” | Carlota Perez
      How might our society show value for the long term, over the short term? Could we think about taxation over time, asks @carlotaprzperez in an interview: 92% for 1 day; 80% within 1 month; 50%-60% tax for 1 year; zero tax for 10 years.Read more ›
    • 2020/07/13 “Making Growing Thinking” |Tim Ingold (web video)
      For the @ArchFoundation, #TimIngold distinguishes outcome-oriented making from process-oriented growing, revisiting #MartinHeidegger “Building Dwelling Thinking”. Organisms are made; artefacts grow. The distinction seems obvious, until you stop to ask what assumptions it contains, about the inside and outside of things…Read more ›
  • RSS on Ing Brief

    • Introduction, “Systems Thinking: Selected Readings, volume 2”, edited by F. E. Emery (1981)
      The selection of readings in the “Introduction” to Systems Thinking: Selected Readings, volume 2, Penguin (1981), edited by Fred E. Emery, reflects a turn from 1969 when a general systems theory was more fully entertained, towards an urgency towards changes in the world that were present in 1981. Systems thinking was again emphasized in contrast […]
    • Introduction, “Systems Thinking: Selected Readings”, edited by F. E. Emery (1969)
      In reviewing the original introduction for Systems Thinking: Selected Readings in the 1969 Penguin paperback, there’s a few threads that I only recognize, many years later. The tables of contents (disambiguating various editions) were previously listed as 1969, 1981 Emery, System Thinking: Selected Readings. — begin paste — Introduction In the selection of papers for this […]
    • Concerns with the way systems thinking is used in evaluation | Michael C. Jackson, OBE | 2023-02-27
      In a recording of the debate between Michael Quinn Patton and Michael C. Jackson on “Systems Concepts in Evaluation”, Patton referenced four concepts published in the “Principles for effective use of systems thinking in evaluation” (2018) by the Systems in Evaluation Topical Interest Group (SETIG) of the American Evaluation Society. The four concepts are: (i) […]
    • Quality Criteria for Action Research | Herr, Anderson (2015)
      How might the quality of an action research initiative be evaluated? — begin paste — We have linked our five validity criteria (outcome, process, democratic, catalytic, and dialogic) to the goals of action research. Most traditions of action research agree on the following goals: (a) the generation of new knowledge, (b) the achievement of action-oriented […]
    • Western Union and the canton of Ticino, Switzerland
      After 90 minutes on phone and online chat with WesternUnion, the existence of the canton of Ticino in Switzerland is denied, so I can’t send money from Canada. TicinoTurismo should be unhappy. The IT developers at Western Union should be dissatisfied that customer support agents aren’t sending them legitimate bug reports I initially tried the […]
    • Aesthetics | Encyclopaedia Britannica | 15 edition
      Stephen C. Pepper was a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th edition, on the entry for Aesthetics.
  • Meta

  • Translate

  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
    Theme modified from DevDmBootstrap4 by Danny Machal